Difference between revisions of "Talk:Neoteny"
From LAH Wiki
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::You deleted "In culture" because it was off topic. Somewhat. But Lolita fashion and pornography, which emphasize youth, youth, youth in legal adults - are related to the topic, be Nabokov's book off topic or no. | ::You deleted "In culture" because it was off topic. Somewhat. But Lolita fashion and pornography, which emphasize youth, youth, youth in legal adults - are related to the topic, be Nabokov's book off topic or no. | ||
| − | --[[User:Louslet|Louslet]] 15:52, 24 September 2007 (PDT) | + | ::--[[User:Louslet|Louslet]] 15:52, 24 September 2007 (PDT) |
| + | |||
| + | :::I know, pretnetious is a pretentious (and not quite accurate) word. But you get the point, so, moving on. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::What you're talking it falls (in part) within the scope of the lolicon article (though I'm not sure we need a legal discussion on LAH Wiki . . .). It might warrant a mention, as it specifically relates to neotony. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Fashion that emphasizes youthful features isn't Neotony; Neotony is physical, not cosmetic. --[[User:Feather|feather]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | After all, the wiki was mainly created so we DON'T have to have any reference to pedophilia, and while originally, mentioning Nabokov and all that might seem like a good idea, let's not turn this into the discussion over the Lolikon article on wikipedia, ne. --[[User:Sat|Sat]] 05:04, 26 September 2007 (PDT) | ||
