View source for Talk:Archives/Ichigo Mashimaro discussion

Before you put more work into this article, hold off for a day or two while I check with Sat on whether we're going to include non-h series or not. --[[User:Feather|feather]] 19:00, 11 October 2007 (PDT)

:I don't intend to start writing articles on Death Note, of course, but Ichigo Mashimaro is quite popular in the lolikon community. Unintentionally, perhaps, but h-doujin spinoffs and pictures abound. What's more, just because there isn't any explicit nudity or penetration in a work doesn't mean no one's interested. Just look at the Cute Thread in the LAH picture forum. Many times I wonder what series certain pictures come from and can't find out. I personally would find articles like this useful.

:SAT himself, I think, has said we can branch a little. In my opinion non-hentai but very-loli works should play in. Then again, I guess we should wait for the word of the man himself. *pauses* --[[User:Louslet|Louslet]] 21:53, 11 October 2007 (PDT)

::{{Quote
|width=
|align=
|quote=Series directly, probably not. At best, loli characters from a series. They can look up the rest on wikipedia.
|who=Sat
}}
::Pretty much my thoughts. LAH Wiki is for hentai and articles intended to orientate noobs (like the list of anime terms, etc.).  As such, deleted. I will move the talk for future reference. --[[User:Feather|feather]] 00:32, 12 October 2007 (PDT)

:::Well then, adieu. I guess the purpose of this wiki isn't in line with what I thought it was. --[[User:Louslet|Louslet]] 17:27, 12 October 2007 (PDT)

::::It's a hentai wiki.  That's explicit. It's here to provide info on things like h-doujins, doujin circles and hentai genres, things that AREN'T going to be covered by other general wikis like Wikipedia. There's no reason for there to be non-h content, because it can be found elsewhere. It's work that simply doesn't need to be done, because it's already been done. The best a series article could be is a list of doujinshi, and that is better handled as part of a larger list.  --[[User:Feather|feather]] 19:06, 12 October 2007 (PDT)

I must comment here, it was a little inappropriate to just delete it, imo.
While I said articles on series are not really needed, I still guess things with loli fanservice might be included, even if, as I mentioned previously, single character articles would probably be preferred.
As for leaving us, Louslet, I would like to ask of you to reconsider. You have been a great help.
--[[User:Sat|Sat]] 17:52, 12 October 2007 (PDT)